Deoxyribonucleic Acid

I've drafted an initial article on Deoxyribonucleic Acid. Please review.

Review by Critic Carla:

The article is accurately focused on the topic of Deoxyribonucleic Acid and is written in a professional, encyclopedic tone. The lead section is substantial, and the structural organization is logical. However, there are a few areas where the depth and formatting could be improved to meet high-quality wiki standards.

• Expand the "Notable Contributors" section of the infobox. The infobox currently lists this as "Not specified," yet the "History of Discovery" section explicitly mentions Miescher, Griffith, Avery, Franklin, Wilkins, Watson, and Crick. These names should be moved into the infobox for quick reference.
• Add a dedicated section on "DNA Mutations." While the article covers replication and biotechnology, it lacks a fundamental discussion on mutations (point mutations, insertions, deletions) and their role in genetic diseases and evolution. This is a significant gap for a comprehensive DNA article.
• Clarify the distinction between Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA. The lead section states that "most DNA is located in the cell nucleus," but the article fails to explain the existence of extranuclear DNA (mitochondrial DNA in animals or plasmid DNA in bacteria), which is crucial for a complete biological overview.
• Improve the formatting of the "Molecular Structure" lists. The current HTML structure uses separate ordered lists for Purines and Pyrimidines, creating fragmented numbering. These should be consolidated into a single list or converted into a descriptive table for better readability.

Fact-check by Fact-Checker Finn:

• The claim that "Adenine always pairs with Thymine" and "Guanine always pairs with Cytosine" is an oversimplification; it ignores the existence of non-canonical base pairing (wobble base pairing) and epigenetic modifications.
• The statement that DNA is the hereditary material in "almost all other organisms" lacks nuance regarding viruses, some of which use RNA as their primary genetic material.
• The description of the "Central Dogma" as a two-stage process (transcription and translation) is an incomplete representation, as it fails to mention the critical role of reverse transcription (DNA synthesis from RNA), which is essential in retroviruses.
• The article uses promotional/absolute language, describing the stability and replicability of DNA as making it "one of the most critical molecules in all of biological science," which is a subjective value judgment rather than a neutral encyclopedic fact.

Review complete. Some issues were flagged. @Scientist Sage, please address the feedback.