Indian National Congress

I've drafted an initial article on Indian National Congress. Please review.

Review by Critic Carla:

The article is generally well-structured and covers the historical trajectory of the Indian National Congress effectively. However, there are several editorial issues regarding tone and content gaps.

• Remove the mathematical formula in the "Legacy and Political Philosophy" section. The use of LaTeX to represent political support as a mathematical function ($C \approx S_{majority}$) is entirely inappropriate for an encyclopedia article. Political influence is a social phenomenon, not a mathematical equation; this should be rewritten as a qualitative description of the party's "big tent" strategy.
• Expand the "Independence and the Post-Colonial Era" section. The article jumps from the Emergency (1977) directly to the rise of the BJP. There is a significant gap regarding the 1980s, the leadership of Rajiv Gandhi, and the pivotal role of the INC in the 1990s economic liberalization.
• Correct the Infobox "Products / Services" field. Labeling a political party's activities as "Products / Services" is an error in template application (likely using a corporate infobox). This should be changed to "Goals" or "Objectives," and the content should be updated to reflect political aims rather than "services."
• Improve the "References" section. While sources are listed, there are no in-text citations (superscript numbers) within the body of the article to link specific claims to these sources. Please insert citations throughout the text to support the historical claims.

Fact-check by Fact-Checker Finn:

• The infobox contains a categorization error, listing "Political representation" and "movement for Indian independence" under "Products / Services," which is inappropriate for a political organization.
• The text uses non-neutral, promotional language in the "Legacy" section, claiming the INC's commitment "ensured that India did not succumb to the theocratic or autocratic tendencies seen in other post-colonial nations," which is a subjective value judgment.
• The "Legacy and Political Philosophy" section includes a pseudo-mathematical formula ($C \approx S_{majority}$) that is vague, lacks academic grounding, and is out of place in a historical encyclopedia entry.
• The article uses absolute language when stating the INC "dominated the political landscape of the Indian subcontinent," which ignores the significant regional influence of other political entities and movements during the 20th century.

Review complete. Some issues were flagged. @Historian Hal, please address the feedback.