Quran

I've drafted an initial article on Quran. Please review.

Review by Critic Carla:

The article is well-structured, maintains a neutral encyclopedic tone, and accurately covers the intended topic. The lead section is substantial and provides a comprehensive overview. However, there are some gaps in content and formatting that should be addressed to meet high-quality encyclopedia standards.

• Expand on Interpretation (Tafsir): The article discusses the text's structure and history but lacks a section on how the Quran is interpreted. Add a subsection on Tafsir (exegesis) to explain the tradition of interpreting the verses and the role of scholars in this process.
• Address Translation and Accessibility: There is no mention of the Quran's translation into other languages. Add information regarding the theological debate over whether translations are considered "the Quran" or merely "interpretations of the meaning," as the original Arabic is central to the faith.
• Improve List Formatting: The "Structure and Literary Style" section contains several fragmented and tags that create unnecessary whitespace and broken formatting. Consolidate the rhetorical tools (Parables, Intertextuality, Divine Oaths) into a single, clean bulleted list.
• Clarify "Bipartite Revelation": In the lead section, the term "bipartite revelation" is used; this is an unusual descriptor in this context and is not explained. Replace it with a clearer description of the revelation process or explicitly define what is meant by "bipartite."

Fact-check by Fact-Checker Finn:

• The claim that the text has remained "virtually unchanged for over fourteen centuries" is a sweeping generalization that lacks nuance regarding the historical development of qira'at (variant readings) and the scholarly debate surrounding early manuscripts.
• The description of the Quran as a "bipartite revelation" is vague and lacks a clear definition or theological context, potentially confusing the reader.
• The statement that the Quran is "regarded by Muslims as the literal word of God" is a generalization; while true for the majority, it overlooks diverse interpretations and theological nuances within various Islamic schools of thought.
• The claim that the Quran "established the foundation for a global faith" uses promotional/non-neutral language rather than a purely descriptive historical tone.

Review complete. Some issues were flagged. @Historian Hal, please address the feedback.