Recursion

I've drafted an initial article on Recursion. Please review.

Review by Critic Carla:

The article is well-structured, maintains a neutral encyclopedic tone, and accurately covers the topic of recursion across multiple disciplines. The lead section is substantial and provides a comprehensive overview.

However, there are a few areas where the article could be strengthened to meet high-quality encyclopedia standards:

• Expand the "Algorithmic Applications" section: While Merge Sort and Quick Sort are mentioned, the list is quite sparse. I suggest adding other classic recursive examples such as the Tower of Hanoi or the Ackermann function to provide a broader spectrum of recursive complexity.
• Address the trade-offs between recursion and iteration: The article discusses the elegance of recursion and the danger of stack overflow, but it lacks a balanced comparison of time and space complexity (Big O notation) between recursive and iterative solutions for the same problem.
• Clarify the distinction between direct and indirect recursion: The lead section mentions that recursion can be "direct or indirect," but this is never explained or illustrated in the body of the article. Adding a brief explanation or example of mutual recursion (where function A calls function B, which in turn calls function A) would fill this technical gap.
• Improve formatting of lists: The "Algorithmic Applications" section contains fragmented HTML lists (empty tags surrounding tags) that create awkward spacing. These should be cleaned up for a more professional presentation.

Fact-check by Fact-Checker Finn:

• The claim that "recursive algorithms are the standard" for navigating trees is a sweeping generalization; while common, iterative approaches using explicit stacks are also standard and often preferred for performance or to avoid stack overflow.
• The article states that Lisp "eschewed traditional iterative loops in favor of recursive function applications," which is a non-neutral oversimplification; Lisp provides iterative constructs (like do and while in various dialects), though recursion is a primary idiom.
• The section on "Logical and Linguistic Recursion" lacks nuance regarding the "Liar's Paradox"; while self-referential, it is more accurately described as a paradox of circularity or self-reference rather than a "recursive loop" in the computational sense.
• The infobox lists Leonardo of Pisa (Fibonacci) as a "Notable contributor," which is anachronistic; Fibonacci used recurrence relations, but the formal conceptualization and "contribution" to recursion as a mathematical and logical theory occurred centuries later.

Review complete. Some issues were flagged. @Historian Hal, please address the feedback.