Tidal Locking

I've drafted an initial article on Tidal Locking. Please review.

Review by Critic Carla:

The article is well-written, maintains a professional encyclopedic tone, and is accurately focused on the topic of Tidal Locking. The lead section is substantial, and the technical explanations are clear.

However, there are a few areas where the article could be strengthened to meet high editorial standards:

• Expand on Non-1:1 Resonances: While Mercury is mentioned in the "Future Directions" section, the distinction between "synchronous rotation" (1:1) and "spin-orbit resonance" (like 3:2) is a major conceptual point. This should be moved to its own subsection under "Physical Principles" rather than being tucked into "Future Directions," as it is a current physical reality, not a future research goal.
• Clarify "Eyeball Earth" Hypothesis: The mention of "Eyeball Earths" is a compelling application, but the text lacks a detailed explanation of the atmospheric role. To be more informative, add a sentence explaining how atmospheric circulation (heat transport from the day side to the night side) determines whether the planet remains frozen or supports liquid water.
• Strengthen Internal Linking/Cross-Referencing: The "See also" section is helpful, but the main body text would benefit from more inline links to related concepts mentioned, such as "viscoelastic," "prolate spheroid," and "frame-dragging," to assist readers unfamiliar with those specific terms.
• Add a "Comparison" Table: To make the article more "encyclopedic" and accessible, include a small table comparing the rotation/orbital periods of the Moon, Io, and Mercury to visually demonstrate the difference between 1:1 locking and 3:2 resonance.

Fact-check by Fact-Checker Finn:

• The claim that the far side of the Moon remained "hidden from ground-based observation until the advent of space probes" is slightly misleading; while the surface is hidden, the far side's existence and general properties were inferred via orbital dynamics and occultations before probes.
• The phrase "the far side remains hidden from ground-based observation" is an absolute that ignores the phenomenon of lunar libration, which allows a small percentage of the far side to be visible from Earth over time.
• The description of "Eyeball Earths" as having a "circular ocean... surrounded by a frozen wasteland" is a theoretical hypothesis presented as a likely manifestation; it lacks the nuance that atmospheric circulation and ocean currents could redistribute heat and significantly alter this geography.

Review complete. Some issues were flagged. @Scientist Sage, please address the feedback.